Monday, May 25, 2020

The Pros and Cons of Technology Essay - 3669 Words

The question of whether modern technological development has been beneficial or detrimental to human beings is perhaps the most pressing question that faces our society. If technology is harmful, then we need to minimize or eliminate the danger. If technology is not the source of the problems and concerns that are frequently attributed to it, then we need to find another cause for the social and psychological pressures faced by our society, so we can address these problems. Ever since the advent of the Industrial Revolution, people have voiced complaints about the harmful effects of technology. Therefore, we need to examine what Martin Heidegger, a twentieth-century German philosopher, called The Question Concerning Technology. In his†¦show more content†¦Entire genres of popular music with revealing names, such as Industrial and Techno have also arisen in recent decades. For example, Industrial music frequently deals with existential anguish, alienation, and meaninglessness of life as important themes. Some Industrial bands, such as Nine Inch Nails, have even produced multi-platinum albums and won important popular music awards. These factors indicate that problem of technology pervades our society and culture, whether consciously or subconsciously. And yet, in order to consider the problems posed by technology, it is necessary to discover the nature of the problem. While examining arguments against modern technology, I have encountered two main strands of thought concerning its dangers. Perhaps one of the best critiques of the modern technological-industrial system can be found in FCs document Industrial Society and Its Future, more commonly known as the Unabomber Manifesto. Because this text has had such a wide-ranging impact on our society, I will examine it first. Although there are many discrepancies with the argument presented in the Manifesto, the concerns expressed within it are valid. For the sake of discussion, I will focus mainly on the issues presented in the Manifesto and the solution proposed therein, rather than on the argument itself. In brief, FCs argument is that the present technological-industrial systemShow MoreRelatedPros And Cons Of Technology1137 Words   |  5 Pages Technology in the past three decades has developed at such an increasingly rapid rate that the last decade’s generation is defined as â€Å"being born in the technological age†. People born in the 1990s are considered the last kids to have known a life without smartphones and computer technology creeping into every aspect of their lives. There are pros and cons to technology, with most of the cons being discovered ever increasingly as people become more and more intertwined with their own personal devicesRead MoreThe Pros And Cons Of Technology733 Words   |  3 PagesTechnology is a distraction â€Å"Among the worst offenders were students at Queen Mary University of London, where there were 54 instances of  cheating  Ã¢â‚¬â€œ two-thirds of which involved technology. At the University of Surrey, 19 students were caught in 2016, 12 of them with devices. Newcastle University, one the bigger institutions to provide data, reported 91 cases of cheating – 43% of which involved technology.† According to www.guardian.com Technology gets in the way of learning. The issue is thatRead MorePros And Cons Of Technology986 Words   |  4 PagesIs technology a curse or blessing? Technology has a dramatic effect on the way we gather and use information. It has impacted daily lives and changed the way people perceive and process information. Many articles have been written about the effects on humans of having so much information immediately available to them. Clive Thompson, a Canadian freelance a journalist and technology writer, discusses the pros and cons of technology use in his book â€Å"Smarter than you think: How Technology is ChangingRead MoreThe Pros And Cons Of Technology1591 Words   |  7 PagesYes: In the world we live in, technology is advancing everywhere from software to machines and even cooking utensils. Improvements to our lives, by technology, include electricity, medical technology, fast productions and, Access to information and education. Without technology the world would be different and it would leave us at a disadvantage. Imagine a world without internet where your teacher assigns you an essay to research nuclear fission. Without the internet, you would have to go toRead MoreThe Pros And Cons Of Technology1289 Words   |  6 PagesIs the technology in today’s world a positive advancement? Over the past few years technology has basically taken over our society. It isn’t just young people that use technology, it is all groups of people, that includes toddlers all the way up to elders. Technology is a major part of today’s society and makes many tasks a lot easier. One major issue with technology is that it’s abused and many people rely on it. Technology is â€Å"dumbing down† today’s society. Technology has not only been a benefitRead MorePros And Cons Of Technology874 Words   |  4 PagesModern humanity can hardly imagine life without technology. Technologies have become an integral part of people’s lives. Every day, people invent new devices or improve the existing ones. Humanity differs by their attitudes to new inventions. Some people believe that sophisticated gadgets are actually useful and necessary, while others concentrate on the negative impact on people and their lives. Similar technologies are specially created for performing the hardest and most monotonous work. EvenRead MorePros And Cons Of Technology1631 Words   |  7 Pagesof us wonder if technology is affecting society for the better, or for the worse. I believe there are major issues on the rise with today’s trending technologies. However, like most thing’s, there are both pro’s and con’s to the way technology affects our society. It has a way of giving us new exper iences, but in some situations technology can actually take away certain experiences. I’d like to explain my reasoning for those beliefs, and better explain that it’s not that technology is good or badRead MoreTechnology : The Pros And Cons Of Technology1668 Words   |  7 Pagespast 10 years technology has changed a drastic amount. Its now more common to have a smart phone then to have a flip phone. It’s also more common to text some rather then call them. Now there is a lot of benefits that can come from technology and I am a strong supported of using it, but its also important to use it the correct way. We all have to limit how much time we spend on technology and if you’re a parent its your reasonability to limit how much time your kids spend on technology. After spendingRead More The Pros and Cons of Technology Essay1525 Words   |  7 PagesThe Pros and Cons of Technology As far back as I can remember my family and I have taken advantage of technology. The types of technology have changed over the years, along with our usage and dependence on it. Technology is a fundamental part of our lifestyle, including both work and play. What is interesting is that we also have many friends who use very little technology in their day-to-day living. This drastic difference makes one wonder how necessary the technology really is, and whether orRead MoreThe Pros And Cons Of Technology Integration958 Words   |  4 PagesTechnology in K-12 Schools This article discusses the pros and cons of technology integration. There are many arguments and fair points on each end of the spectrum, but it all comes down to how we must progress with technology. Public schools in the United States have more than 5.8 million computers in the schools, and that equals to one computer per nine students, and while seems like a lot, it does not allow every student access, so teachers are less likely to use computers in their lessons (Wurster)

Thursday, May 14, 2020

Enterprise Risk Management techniques within a business - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 14 Words: 4192 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Management Essay Type Analytical essay Did you like this example? Enterprise risk management (ERM) is a recent risk management technique where a portfolio of risks is managed in a holistic manner. ERM has inspired interests from various parties including corporate executives, regulators, and rating agencies. Under the ERM framework, corporations take on necessary risks to pursue their strategic objectives within their respective risk appetite. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Enterprise Risk Management techniques within a business" essay for you Create order The core of the ERM process is efficient risk integration. Inter-relations among risks and risk prioritization are highlighted in the risk integration process under ERM. Certain risk measures and aggregation methods are usually involved in its implementation. Effective risk reporting and communications in a well-designed organizational structure are also essential for the success of ERM. Being an evolving process, the ultimate goal of ERM is to move beyond the initial incentive of fulfilling compliance need to achieving real economic value. Note: * in the main text suggests possible cross-references to other entries in the encyclopedia. The same term which appears multiple times is only marked once. WHAT IS ERM? Definition Enterprise risk management (ERM) is a recent risk management technique practiced increasingly by large corporations in all industries throughout the world. It was listed as one of the twenty breakthrough ideas for 2004 in Harvard Business Review [1]. ERM reflects the change of mindset in risk management over the past decades. Business leaders realize that certain risks are inevitable in order to create value through operations and some risks are indeed precious opportunities if effectively exploited and managed. In pursuit of the above, a corporations risk management practice should be carried out in a holistic fashion, aligned with its strategic objectives. It flows from the recognition that a dollar spent on risk is a dollar cost to the firm regardless of whether this risk arises in the finance arena or in the context of a physical calamity such as a fire. ERM proposes that the firm address these risks in a unified manner. The prevailing definition of ERM adopted by most corporations is the one proposed by Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in their 2004 ERM framework [2]. It intended to establish key concepts, principles and techniques of ERM. In this framework, ERM is defined as a process, effected by an entitys board of directors, management and other personnel, applied in strategy setting and across the enterprise, designed to identify potential events that may affect the entity, and manage risk to be within its risk appetite, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of entity objectives. This definition highlights that ERM reaches to the highest level of the organizational structure and is directly related to the corporations business strategies. The concept of risk appetite is a crucial component of the definition. Risk appetite reflects the firms willingness and ability to take on risks in order to achieve the objective. Once it is establishe d, all subsequent risk management decisions will be made within the corporations risk appetite. Thus, the articulation of risk appetite greatly affects the robustness and success of an ERM process. Different themes of business objectives are applied to determine risk appetite. Among the most common ones are solvency concerns, ratings concerns, and earnings volatility concerns [3]. The themes directing the risk appetite process should be consistent with the corporations risk culture and overall strategies. Despite its wide acceptance, the COSO definition is not the only available definition. For example, Casualty Actuarial Society (CAS) offered an alternative definition in its 2003 overview of ERM. In CASs definition, ERM is the discipline by which an organization in any industry assesses, controls, exploits, finances, and monitors risks from all sources for the purpose of increasing the organizations short- and long-term value to its stakeholders. [4] There are indications that ERM definition is gradually becoming organization specific. Individual corporations may define ERM uniquely according to their own understanding and objectives. Ai (2006) suggested that creating a clear, firm-tailored definition is an important precursor to the firm implementing a successful ERM framework. In fact, a 2006 survey of US corporations identified that lack of an unambiguous understanding of ERM is the one obstacle preventing companies from putting ERM in place [5]. Current development of ERM As a rising management discipline, current development of ERM varies across industries and corporations. The insurance industry, financial institutions, and the energy industry are among the industry sectors where ERM has seen relatively advanced development in a broad range of corporations [6]. The enforcement of ERM in these industries was originally stimulated by regulatory requirements. Recently, more corporations in other industries, and even the public sector, are becoming aware of the potential value of ERM and risk managers are increasingly bringing it to top executives agendas. According to a 2006 survey of US corporations, over two thirds of the surveyed companies either have an ERM program in place or are seriously considering adopting one [5]. An earlier survey of Canadian companies obtained similar results. It found that over a third of the sample companies were practicing ERM in 2003 and an even larger portion of the sample companies were moving in that direction [7]. Different stages of ERM implementation have been identified. According to a 2005 survey conducted of Canadian and US organizations, ERM implementation can be broken down into three stages based on the level of development [8]. Stage one is ERM strategy development, where corporations define key concepts, make ERM policies and establish the risk management framework. The second stage is ERM strategy implementation. Corporations at this stage implement the established ERM framework in their overall strategies and operations. The third stage of ERM is monitoring and maintaining the system. At this stage, ERM sustainability is the main focus achieved by effective internal and/or external evaluations. Only a small number of corporations, mainly in insurance, financial and utility industries, are at this stage of ERM practice. It is worth noting that ERM is a continuous evolving process, by no means limited to the above identified three stages. As more in-depth understanding and techniques are developed, corporations will move upward to higher stages and more advanced stages are also likely to emerge. ERM IMPLEMENTATION Notwithstanding the attractiveness of ERM conceptually, corporations are often challenged to put it into effect. One of the main challenges in ERM implementation is to manage the totality of corporation risks as a portfolio rather than as individual silos as is traditionally done. Several specific aspects of ERM implementation together with present challenges are considered below. Determinants of ERM Although ERM is largely considered as the most advanced risk management concept and toolkit, it is carried out at different paces by corporations. Studies have examined corporate characteristics that appear to be determinants of ERM adoption. For example, Liebenberg and Hoyt (2003) [9] find that firms with greater financial leverage are more likely to appoint a Chief Risk Officer (CRO), to signal their adoption of ERM. In another study, factors including presence of CRO, board independence, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) support for ERM, use of Big Four auditors, and entity size are found to be positively related to the stage of ERM adoption [6]. These factors reflect ERMs role in corporate governance. Launch and pursuit of the ERM process lead to better corporate governance, which is desired by both external and internal constituencies. Operationalization of ERM The core of the challenge lies in operationalizing ERM in practice. Integration of risks is not merely a procedure of stacking all risks together, but rather a procedure of fully recognizing the inter-relations among risks and prioritizing risks to create true economic value. Important components of this procedure include risk identification, risk measurement, risk aggregation, risk prioritization and risk communication. Risk identification The four major categories of risks considered under an ERM framework are hazard risk, financial risk, operational risk*, and strategic risk [4]. Hazard risk refers to physical risks whose financial consequences are traditionally mitigated by purchasing insurance policies. Examples of hazard risk include fire, theft, business interruption, liability claims, etc. Financial risk refers to those risks involving capital and financial market. Market risk (interest rate risk, commodity risk, foreign exchange risk) and credit risk (default risk) are among the most important financial risks. This type of risk is usually hedged by financial instruments, such as derivatives. Operational risk is a nascent risk category and has inspired increasing interest. Operational risk includes internal fraud, external fraud, employment practices and workplace safety, clients, products and business practices, damage to physical assets, business disruption and system failures, and execution, delivery and proc ess management [10]. The newly released Basel Capital Accord II [10] first drew attention to operational risk in the banking industry. The impact soon spreads to other industries and now operational risk is ranked as the most important risk domain by US corporation executives [5]. However, given the complex and dynamic nature of operational risk, there is no easy access to the solution. Its management requires sophisticated and innovative risk management techniques. Lastly, strategic risk is more directly related to the corporations overall strategies. It includes reputation risk, competition risk, regulatory risk, etc. The management of strategic risk does not fall automatically into standard categories of risk management techniques. Specific risks perceived by each corporation need to be identified and managed customarily. The identification of the above four categories of risks is not meant to suggest separate management of each category. Rather, under ERM, identification of individual risks should facilitate successive prioritization and aggregation of risks to best achieve business objectives within the corporations risk appetite. Moreover, not all risks likely to face the corporation fall into one of the above major categories. Any event that can potentially affect the corporations objectives is considered a risk under ERM. Therefore, proper objective identification is the prerequisite for risk identification. Business objectives can be described by certain key performance indicators (KPIs), usually financial measures such as return on equity (ROE), operating income, earnings per share (EPS) and others for specific industries, e.g. risk adjusted return on capital (RAROC) and risk based capital (RBC) for financial and insurance industries [4]. By means of these company performance measures, risks ar e recognized according to the strategic goals established for each company, which is the first step to implement a sound ERM process Risk aggregation and risk measures* A central step towards operationalizing ERM is risk integration. Holmer and Zenios (1995) [11] is among the earliest studies that shed light on value created by process integration/ holistic management. In their work, an approach that integrates different parts of the production process (designing, pricing, and manufacturing) was proposed to improve productivity of financial intermediaries. Although risk management was rarely involved in that work, the underlying rationale is essentially the same. One sensible way to unify and integrate different types of risks is to derive the total risk (loss) distribution. The process starts with individual risks, which, as random outcomes, are usually represented by certain distribution functions technically. An aggregated risk distribution for the entire corporation can be derived from these individual risk distributions. Some risk measure is then developed to reflect the risk level. The risk measure can be denoted in dollar terms, in the form of capital requirements. In essence, risk management and capital management are two sides of a coin under ERM as the aim here is to create optimal returns using available capital by bearing risks [12]. Aggregated risk distribution functions essentially contain two parts: the marginal distributions for individual risks and the inter-relations between the risks. Marginal distributions are found for each identified individual risk through parametric models, non-parametric models or stochastic simulations [13]. Parametric models fit data in certain pre-determined distribution functions. Nonparametric models rely on histogram or kernel density estimation of historical data. Stochastic simulations methods (Monte Carlo Markov Chain simulation) start by generating random numbers through repeated runs. Stochastic simulation methods have become more and more popular in both academia and practice. There are also multiple ways to capture the inter-relations among risks. A simple approach is through variance-covariance matrices. Correlations between different risks are either calculated based on historical data or conjectured by domain experts. Alternatively, structure simulation models can be employed to link possibly correlated risks to common factors [4]. For example, different types of market risks may be driven by the same macro-economic conditions. These macroeconomic conditions thus result in the interactions among market risks. Inter-relations among risks can be exploited to determine natural hedges and place early warnings on catastrophic events where different types of risks strike together, which may lead to real economic benefits created by ERM. At a slightly more sophisticated level, dependence structures can be modeled by using a copula. A copula is a flexible tool to capture the dependence structure among risks. Suppose we have two risks X and Y with distribution functions FX(x) and FY(y). Denote the joint distribution function by FX,Y(x,y). Then the copula is defined as (1) [14]. Thus, we can derive the joint distribution function from marginal distribution functions by using copula. Various types of copulas (for example, normal copula or student-t copula) can be employed together with different choice of marginal distributions to model dependency. Quantile-based measures are perhaps the most prevalent risk measures currently. This class of risk measures focus on the tail area of the distribution functions, i.e., those events occurring with low probabilities but are associated with large losses should they occur. These risk measures reflect an intention to protect shareholder value in time of default or insolvency. The well known Value-at-Risk (VaR)* measure is of this type. VaR is the maximum loss suffered at a given confidence level (e.g. 95%) over a certain period of time (e.g. 1 trading day). Mathematically, we define VaR at the ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ± confidence level as the ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ±-quantile of the loss distribution function F(X), or (2). Although VaR measures are extensively employed, especially in financial risk management, doubts have been raised on VARs ability to depict a complete risk picture as a valid risk measure [13]. One of the most important concerns is that VaR fails to satisfy the sub-additivity property desired by any coherent risk measure. A closely related alternative measure is proposed to make up for the possible shortcomings of VaR, namely, Expected Shortfall (or loosely, Tail-VaR). Expected Shortfall takes into account not only the probability of adverse events as VaR but also the average magnitude of these events. Mathematically,(3), where ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ± is the confidence level. Further considerations lead to other classes of risk measures. For example, the so-called spectral risk measures [16] incorporate a weighting function to describe different degrees of risk aversions on quantiles. In this sense, Expected Shortfall is seen as imperfect since it assigns equal weight () to the entire (1-ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ±) region (and a weight of zero outside the region), indicating risk neutrality rather than risk aversion in the region. Moreover, an important risk measure based on distorted distribution functions was developed by Wang (2000, 2002) [17] [18]. The distorted decumulative distribution functions S*(x) are produced by applying a function g (.) to the original loss decumulative distribution function S(x) (S(x)=1-F(x) (4)): S*(x) = g [S(x)] (5), where g is an increasing function with g(0)=0 and g(1)=1. Wang (2000, 2002) [17] [18] suggest specific choices of distortion function g(.): (6) and (7), where is the standard normal distribution function, Q is the stude nt-t distribution function, and is the market price of risk parameter. These are known as Wangs one factor and two factor transform. A coherent risk measure can then be developed by taking expectation against the distorted distribution function. Rather than the focus solely on the tails, as quantile-based risk measures do, sometimes risk measures are designed to account for other parts of the distribution functions. Measures based on standard deviations (variance) belong to this class. In constructing these measures, an on-going concern rather than a solvency concern is often the primary focus [4]. In practice, simplified approaches are sometimes adopted to obtain the aggregated risk measure rather than relying on the total loss distribution and develop the risk measure as described above. For example, one can derive the portfolio VaR as a weighted sum of VaR for each component risk which implies perfect correlation between risks. Or sometimes, multivariate normality is assumed for the individual risk components and a VaR measure is obtained accordingly. However, these simplified measures should be used with caution since they may lead to biased total risk estimation [14]. Risk prioritization To realize risk integration, ERM also advocates risk prioritization. Risk prioritization stems from the fact that risks are not equally important to corporations. Prioritization should reflect different aspects of the companys strategies and risk management philosophy, e.g., cost to handle that risk, contract restrictions on that risk, managements risk preference, etc. A two dimensional risk map is often used (See Figure 1) in ranking the risks. The vertical axis represents impact of the underlying risks (the severity of losses) and the horizontal axis represents likelihood of the underlying risks (the frequency of losses). Different alert levels and risk management strategies are placed on each quarter panel. The low likelihood, low impact area usually needs minimum alarm, the high likelihood, low impact area should be dealt with accordingly by the risk management team, the low likelihood, high impact area requires for high attention and the high likelihood, high impact area can be disastrous to the corporation and thus demands full alert and tight control [19]. According to the ranking suggested by the risk map, corporations may want to prioritize those risks with high impact, as they are the kind of risks that may bring down the entire corporation once incurred. Risk management activities should then be executed according to priority and characteristics of risks. (Figure 1 insert about here) Alternatively, risks can also be ranked and prioritized based on their respective impacts on KPIs [4]. As we explained above, KPIs describe corporations strategic targets. The ultimate aim of ERM is to assist corporations in achieving these strategic targets by managing risks in the most effective way. Thus, risks that have higher potential influence on KPIs (or other chosen measures of objectives) should be prioritized and treated with focus. Risk reporting and risk communications* Despite the extensive attention given to the technical aspects, ERM is not just about tons of numbers and stacks of risk reports. A key factor for success is effective risk communication from the board and executive management to operational units and across different business departments of corporations. One way to improve risk communication is through a well-designed risk reporting system [20]. The risk reporting system should both provide succinct summaries of critical risk information covering the broad range of corporate risks for board members and executives, and allow access to more detailed information for those responsible for specific risks at the operational level. Moreover, both qualitative and quantitative analysis should be incorporated into this single system. ERM softwares are developed for this purpose. For example, an ERM dashboard, an interface providing role-based information to key decision makers is recommended for risk reporting [20]. Risk registers are also us ed widely for risk reporting and management. Risk registers record relevant information including risks, risk assessments, impact on KPIs, risk management tools and responsible personnel, to keep track of the risk management activities and allow interactions among different parties [19]. There are other commercial ERM softwares in development for use of general or particular corporations. ERM AND COMPLIANCE* ERM at first arises from corporations continuous efforts for compliance with laws and regulations. To this end, ERM is seen more as an efficient internal control process. Within a corporation, it is often conducted with internal control function and supervised by internal auditors. The most significant regulatory forces responsible for the prosperity of ERM are the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, Basel Capital Accord II and rating criteria set forth by Standard Poors. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 In the US, the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 [21] greatly raised compliance difficulty for corporations. Section 404 of the act rules the corporations internal control activities over financial reporting and disclosure to the public. External auditors are also involved through assessing and attesting corporations internal control effects. Corporations have invested great amount of time and money to comply with the act. In this process, they turn to ERM as a solution to adequate and efficient internal control, rather than for general risk management purposes. On a separate note, Sarbanes Oxley Act itself poses as a great operational risk (compliance risk) to most corporations. As far as this is concerned, ERM lends itself to an effectively toolkit for managing this type of risk in corporations overall risk portfolio. Basel Capital Accord II Basel Capital Accord II [10] has also likely contributed to the development of ERM. This new Basel Capital Accord describes clearly the determination of capital requirements for the banking industry from the regulatory point of view. Besides minimum capital requirements, it also highlights the importance of supervisory review process of management of major risks. For the first time, Basel II explicitly reflects regulatory interest in operational risk. Regulatory capital requirements and review process should stipulate ERM adoption by corporations, to attain unification of risk and capital management, and to fulfill compliance needs. Rating agency Compared to the previous two forces, rating agencies have a more direct influence on promoting ERM practice. Rating agencies have always been a major constituency for corporations. Standard Poors (SP) started to evaluate ERM practice and incorporate it in the rating process for insurers in 2005 [22] and refined the criteria in 2006 [23]. The rating criteria span important components of the ERM process. Risk management culture, risk control techniques, methodologies and principles employed by risk models and the ability to deal with emerging risks all contribute to insurers overall ERM assessment. SP also gives positive weight to the articulation of risk appetite (and resulting risk tolerance, risk limits, etc.), which further demonstrates the fundamental role of risk appetite in the ERM process. In 2006, SP extends its ERM evaluation to the financial industry by developing rating criteria specifically for financial institutions [24]. The ERM assessment framework is built up in three dimensions: infrastructure, policies, and methodology. The evaluation process focus on five aspects: risk governance, operational risk, market risk, credit risk, and funding and liquidity. Among those, risk governance includes risk culture, risk appetite, risk aggregation/quantification and risk disclosure. Highly rated financial institutions are those that use effective methodologies and procedures to control each important category of risks, and have a holistic view of the overall risk profile. SPs rating will undoubtedly encourage continuous adoption and elaboration of ERM in these industries. In the foreseeable future, it is very likely that rating agencies may start to establish rating criteria for general industries, which will provide even stronger incentive for all corporations to advance aggressively in the ERM process. ERM FUTURE VALUE CREATION (CONCLUSION) ERM practices may have been initially driven by compliance needs, however ERM development should continue to serve an internal control function for better corporate governance. Moreover, the forces upon which ERM thrives are related to the potential economic values generated by better managing risks under identified objectives. One common objective for the majority of corporations is to maximize firm value. ERM is the framework where corporations optimize the risk/return relationships for their businesses. This optimization is achieved through alignment of corporate strategic goals and risk appetite. At the operational level, the alignment guides virtually all activities conducted by the corporation. Specific risks are identified and measured. They are prioritized and integrated by recognizing the inter-relations and relative influences. Risk management strategies are developed for the portfolio of risks. The effects are assessed and communicated. In this way, ERM cuts waste of resou rces caused by inadequate communication and cooperation under silo-based risk management framework. ERM also increases the capacity and frees space for new opportunities to be explored. Other than these two primary sources of value, more effective risk management also creates benefits from higher credit ratings, lower distress costs, more favorable contract provisions, etc. Testing the added value of ERM itself is another presented challenge. Wang (2002) [18] proposes that value creation can be calculated as the increase in economic value of the portfolio after implementing ERM, where economic value is obtained by discounting the expected total profit/loss taken against the distorted distribution function (by two-factor Wangs transform). Zenios (2001) [25] demonstrates from an operations research perspective that effective integration of risks under ERM will create value by pushing out the risk/award frontier of the entire portfolio. More theoretical and empirical analysis is needed to demonstrate/test the added value from ERM. We conclude on a final note of the evolving nature of ERM. ERM is still at its early stage of development for the most part. Conceptual and practical frameworks are still being constructed through gathered efforts from regulators, industries and academia. More advanced methodologies, techniques and tools are emerging every day. Therefore, some of the aspects (e.g., what ERM really is, the real effect, how it can be best implemented, etc.) described are necessarily vague and debatable due to the lack of consensus regarding exactly what constitute effective ERM and lack of evidences regarding the empirical benefits of different implementation scenarios of ERM. It is the hope that most of the ambiguity will resolve itself as this process goes on and more concrete and analytical discussions can then be carried out.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Case Study Apple Inc. - 990 Words

This research portfolio is about Apple Inc., a multinational company that has many operating locations in the world, such as China, Taiwan, Japan, Ireland, Europe, Australia and so on. This paper will focus on Apple s background information, its global operations and lastly, its employees and suppliers that help with the success of its daily operations. Apple Background Info Apple Inc. operates in many different countries in the world. There are three major countries that Apple operates in, which are Ireland, China, and the United States. Apple is set to hire an additional 1000 workers for its Irish operations (Mizroch, 2016). Most countries Apple operates from are members of some type of trade organization. China is a member of the IMF (Imf.org, 2016), a member of the World Bank (Worldbank.org, 2016) and a member of WTO (Wto.org, 2016). Ireland is a member of the IMF (Imf.org, 2016), a member of the World Bank (Worldbank.org, 2016) and a member of the WTO (Wto.org, 2016). United States is a member of the IMF (Imf.org, 2016), a member of the World Bank (Worldbank.org, 2016) and a member of the WTO (Wto.org, 2016). In addition, Apple operates in countries that are economically or politically risky as long as theirs great potential for viable profits. These three major countries that Apple operates from, follow the guidelines of these world trade institut ions even though I also believe that they are certain trade conflicts that must arise between these countries andShow MoreRelatedCase Study : Apple Inc.1349 Words   |  6 Pages Case Analysis: APPLE INC.: IPODS AND ITUNES Donna Martinelli TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY September 3, 2014 Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................3 Introduction†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..3 Defining the Challenge...............................................................................................3 Analyzing the case data....................Read MoreCase Study : Apple Inc. Essay1422 Words   |  6 PagesCase Study: Apple Apple Inc. focuses on the design, manufacture, and marketing of personal computers, mobile phones, multimedia devices, and portable music players. Apple Inc. offers consumers manufactured goods under the brand names Apple Watch, iPhone, iPad, Mac, iPod, and Apple TV. Enhancing the customer experience through their proprietary software applications iOS, X, OS, and watchOS brands; and services across their Apple Pay and iCloud products (Forbes.com, 2016). Explored in detail, Apple’sRead MoreApple Inc. Case Study1494 Words   |  6 PagesApple Inc. Case Study TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPANY OVERVIEW General Description Historical Outline Industry Current Challenges Ethics and Responsibility STRATEGIC INFORMATION Mission Statement Competition SWOT Analysis HISTORICAL FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Historical Financial Information Competitive Financial Analysis Summary FUTURE PLANS Competitive Advantage Recent Performance Business Environment Recommendations Zackery Butler, Connor Daugherty, Stanashia Davis, Gabrielle Drohan, and Lauren SpearsRead MoreCase Study : Apple Inc.1971 Words   |  8 PagesCritical Essay Introduction Apple Inc. is a globally recognised pioneer in the tech industry. It is a corporation that designs, develops and sells electronic products such as tablets, computers and phones. Founded by Ronald Wayne, Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak in 1976, it is a multinational corporation with headquarters in Cupertino, California. Tim Cook has been CEO since Jobs’ passing in 2011. Labour conditions Despite its global recognition and status, Apple Inc. has come under scrutiny in recentRead MoreCase Study : Apple Inc.2083 Words   |  9 PagesBackground This paper presents a case study of Apple Inc. Apple Inc. is a technology based corporation with emphasis on computer software and hardware (MAC and Apps), tablets (IPad), smart phones (IPhone), and mp3 plays, (ITouch). Apple Inc. has grown tremendously over the years and ever since 2001 has expanded its brand and retail stores to over 375 stores/outlets globally. The business has seventy two thousand eight hundred employees in thirty eight countries. Apple Inc. has truly become one of theRead MoreCase Study : Apple Inc. Essay6014 Words   |  25 PagesIntroduction On a daily basis we all encounter all forms of technology. There are several technological corporations in the current industry but one stands out†¦.Apple Inc. Apple Inc. is an international corporation, situated in Cupertino, California. The company designs, manufactures and markets consumer electronics and computer software products. Apple is well known for its hardware products such as Macintosh computers, the iPod, the iPhone and its innovative software such as the Mac OS X operating systemRead MoreCase Study : Apple Inc.1943 Words   |  8 Pages Apple Inc was incorporated in 1977 by Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs. As a startup company Apple Inc went through several management changes and conflicts which caused the company to lose some of its competitive advantage against companies like Dell, Gateway and Microsoft. The company designs and manufactures various products in the computer and music industry. Apple being strictly a personal computer company decided to venture into marketing other products like the iPod, a digital music player, andRead MoreApple Inc Case Study851 Words   |  4 PagesApple inc. 1) Introduction Background and summary This article present the story of Steve Jobs and it’s Apple company through two aspects. From the company history perspective and the product industry perspective. On company history side: Apple was founded by two Steves. Apple board later fired Jobs and gradually went near bankruptcy. Till 1997, Apple brought back Jobs and became the most valuable company in the world in 2012. On the product industry side, Article dig into the fieldRead MoreCase Study : Apple Inc.1417 Words   |  6 Pageschanged the world with Apple Inc Company. Both of them was out of college, they were making so much money in the computer company Apple was started with introduction of computer I computer on April 1, 1976. Apple was incorporated January 3, 1977. The Apple II was introduced on April 16, 1977 at the first West Coast computer Faire. The Apple II was chosen to be the desktop platform for the ground breaking use call spreadsheet program. He was created a business market for the Apple II and gave home usersRead MoreCase Study : Apple Inc.1732 Words   |  7 PagesApple Inc. is a California based company that was incorporated in 1977. According to University of Oregon Investment Group, â€Å"Apple operates out of 8 different segments: Desktops, Portables, iPod, iPhone, iPad, other music related products and services, peripherals and other hardware, software, service and oth er sales† (2012). According to the company’s 2013 10-K, â€Å"Apple sells its products worldwide through its retail stores, online stores, and direct sales force, as well as through third-party cellular

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

International Management

Question: Discuss about theInternational Management. Answer: Introduction: The uncomfortable sense of disharmony, confusion, discord or conflict arising from a change in the cultural environment, is known as cultural dissonance (Daenekindt and Roose 2014). The cultural changes may be sudden, unexplained and not clear as there are a lot of cultural dynamics involved. The individuals exposed to the multiple cultures often face a situation of conflict when they make a transition from one culture to a different culture. This phenomenon may take in the same culture, where there is the existence of a number of sub-cultures (Lee and Jeyaraj 2014). There may be different clashes like spiritual, physical, ethical, identity and others, which may lead to cultural dissonance. This reflective paper would discuss about my personal experiences of the cultural dissonance and how I overcome them. Discussion I travelled to India, one of the most famous country in Asia, last year. I had one month holiday and hence started to explore the world. I visited a southwestern region of India, known as Karnataka, which has some picturesque locales. My tourist guide took me to a remote village to enjoy the natural beauty. I was surprised by the cultural imbalance in the region. There are different caste systems in the village and there was no cordial relationships between the members of the communities (Desai and Dubey 2012). There were severe enmity between the people of two different castes. I witnessed widespread violence all around. My tourist guide, however, told me that it is a normal phenomenon, in this region. I personally felt a great degree of discomfort in the village. I was startled by the level of untouchability practiced in this modern age (Thorat and Joshi 2015). It is severely practiced here and though I had read it earlier, I was shocked to see the real picture of this social taboo. The lower caste people, often known as Scheduled Tribes or the Scheduled Castes or Dalits, were not allowed to enter public places (Rao 2015). They didnt find suitable education or employment opportunities. They were being deprieved from a lot of things. I found this against the humanity. I believed that we are human beings and hence should possess equal rights, but I found that merely being a human being is not sufficient in this village. The upper class people didnt wish to be touched by the lower caste people (Rao 2015). I felt such cruel practice is against humanity and I felt uneasy and wished to run away from the place. I seemed to have lost my cultural identity after witnessing such cultural indifferences. I perceived that culture is concerned with freedom, society obligation, harmony, mutual respect, but I was wrong (Eyerman and McCormick 2015). I was primarily thinking of the western cultural attributes which may not be applicable to all parts of the world. This was causing a cultural dissonance (Eyerman and McCormick 2015). I found out that there are a large number of child laborers in the village (Dumas 2013). Childhood is the time for education and subsequent development of values, beliefs as well as principles. I was again proved wrong after I visited this place. The children of the lower classes were denied access to schools and also their families were not eager to make their ward educated. They were happy to lease out their children and earn some money. I really felt uncomfortable after learning the mentality of the people. These feelings collided with my beliefs and hence caused cultural dissonance (Daenekindt and Roose 2014). I perceive the social boycott as a brutal behavior which I was not previously exposed to. I felt uneasy and started to imagine myself in the same situation. I felt numbness in my head thinking that what would have happened if I was born in this village. I would also have to go through the same kind of things. I believed that my positive mind, individualism, migration, cultural bereavement, social mobility, exposure to the western culture and the beliefs of equality led to the cultural dissonance that I faced in India (Guzder Santhanam-Martin and Rousseau 2014). I overcome the cultural dissonance by taking active measures. I started adjusting to the situation by accepting it as the inherent culture in this part of the world and I should not feel uncomfortable about it (Eyerman and McCormick 2015). I expected differences to come up in the next couple of days. I started to deal positively with the culture shock and accommodate myself in the new culture, at least for a few days. I also started communicating with the locals so that I can get a fairly good idea of the host culture. I also started to make observations of the native people who are accustomed to this culture. I resisted the feeling of losing my own culture and welcomed the new culture as an additional one. I learnt that each culture has some distinct characteristics which makes it unique. It separates it from other cultures. The different culture has a different way of life, habits, customs and opinions. It is good to embrace it rather than feeling uncomfortable. The exposure to dif ferent cultures, not only enhance my knowledge, but also makes me a better human being (Eyerman and McCormick 2015). I was a more mature and confident individual, after I came back. I learnt that I should respect each culture of the world and understand the true essence of it. I should get rid of the negative emotions while travelling to a different culture and instead possess a positive mind. Conclusion I feel that cultural dissonance is an important issue in this age of globalization. The cross border education, trade or travel has become a common phenomenon. In such circumstances, it is necessary to reduce the cultural dissonance, commonly faced by the individuals. I may travel to a foreign land for professional commitments and if I cannot overcome cultural dissonance, then I would have to suffer a lot. This assignment helped me to overcome the cultural dissonance and made me a confident individual. References Daenekindt, S. and Roose, H., 2014. Social mobility and cultural dissonance.Poetics,42, pp.82-97. Desai, S. and Dubey, A., 2012. Caste in 21st century India: competing narratives.Economic and political weekly,46(11), p.40. Dumas, C., 2013. Market imperfections and child labor.World development,42, pp.127-142. Eyerman, R. and McCormick, L., 2015.Myth, Meaning and Performance: Toward a New Cultural Sociology of the Arts. Routledge. Guzder, J., Santhanam-Martin, R. and Rousseau, C., 2014. Gender, Power and Ethnicity in Cultural Consultation. InCultural Consultation(pp. 163-182). Springer New York. Lee, J.J.Y. and Jeyaraj, S., 2014. Effects of self-construal differences on cognitive dissonance examined by priming the independent and interdependent self.SAGE Open,4(1), p.2158244014521434. Rao, A., 2015. Caste System (Dalit/Untouchability).The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Thorat, A. and Joshi, O., 2015. The Continuing Practice of Untouchability in India: Patterns and Mitigating Influences.India Human Development Study Working Paper,3.